Objective
In the context of developing boiling histotripsy (BH) as a potential clinical approach for non-invasive mechanical ablation of kidney tumors, the concept of BH dose (BHD) was quantitatively investigated in porcine and canine kidney models in vivo and ex vivo.

Methods
Volumetric lesions were produced in renal tissue using a 1.5-MHz 256-element HIFU-array with various pulsing protocols: pulse duration t_p = 1–10 ms, number of pulses per point ppp = 1–15. Two BHD metrics were evaluated: BHD1 = ppp, BHD2 = t_p × ppp. Quantitative assessment of lesion completeness was performed by their histological analysis and assignment of damage score to different renal compartments (i.e., cortex, medulla, and sinus). Shear wave elastography (SWE) was used to measure the Young's modulus of renal compartments in vivo vs ex vivo, and before vs after BH treatments.

Results
In vivo tissue required lower BH doses to achieve identical degree of fractionation as compared to ex vivo. Renal cortex (homogeneous, low in collagen) was equal or higher in stiffness than medulla (anisotropic, collagenous), 5.8–12.2 kPa vs 4.7–9.6 kPa, but required lower BH doses to be fully fractionated. Renal sinus (fatty, irregular, with abundant collagenous structures) was significantly softer ex vivo vs in vivo, 4.9–5.1 kPa vs 9.7–15.2 kPa, but was barely damaged in either case with any tested BH protocols. BHD1 was shown to be relevant for planning the treatment of renal cortex (sufficient BHD1 = 5 pulses in vivo and 10 pulses ex vivo), while none of the tested doses resulted in complete fractionation of medulla or sinus. Post-treatment SWE imaging revealed reduction of tissue stiffness ex vivo by 27–58%, increasing with the applied dose, and complete absence of shear waves within in vivo lesions, both indicative of tissue liquefaction.

Conclusion
The results imply that tissue resistance to mechanical fractionation, and hence required BH dose, are not solely determined by tissue stiffness but also depend on its composition and structural arrangement, as well as presence of perfusion. The SWE-derived reduction of tissue stiffness with increasing BH doses correlated with tissue damage score, indicating potential of SWE for post-treatment confirmation of BH lesion completeness.

Bacterial loads can be effectively reduced using cavitation-mediated focused ultrasound, or histotripsy. In this study, gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli) in suspension were used as model bacteria to evaluate the effectiveness of two regimens of histotripsy treatments: cavitation histotripsy (CH) and boiling histotripsy (BH).

The results of this study suggest that both CH and BH can be used to inactivate E. coli in suspension, with the optimal regimen depending on the attainable peak negative focal pressure at the target.

Pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound (pHIFU) is a non-invasive method that allows to permeabilize pancreatic tumors through inertial cavitation and thereby increase the concentration of systemically administered drug. In this study the tolerability of weekly pHIFU-aided administrations of gemcitabine (gem) and their influence on tumor progression and immune microenvironment were investigated in genetically engineered KrasLSL.G12D/ƥ; p53R172H/ƥ; PdxCretg/ƥ (KPC) mouse model of spontaneously occurring pancreatic tumors. KPC mice were enrolled in the study when the tumor size reached 4–6 mm and treated once a week with either ultrasound-guided pHIFU (1.5 MHz transducer, 1 ms pulses, 1% duty cycle, peak negative pressure 16.5 MPa) followed by administration of gem (n = 9), gem only (n = 5) or no treatment (n = 8). Tumor progression was followed by ultrasound imaging until the study endpoint (tumor size reaching 1 cm), whereupon the excised tumors were analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene expression profiling (Nanostring PanCancer Immune Profiling panel). The pHIFU + gem treatments were well tolerated; the pHIFU-treated region of the tumor turned hypoechoic immediately following treatment in all mice, and this effect persisted throughout the observation period (2–5 weeks) and corresponded to areas of cell death, according to histology and IHC. Enhanced labeling by Granzyme-B was observed within and adjacent to the pHIFU treated area, but not in the non-treated tumor tissue; no difference in CD8 + staining was observed between the treatment groups. Gene expression analysis showed that the pHIFU + gem combination treatment lead to significant downregulation of 162 genes related to immunosuppression, tumorigenesis, and chemoresistance vs gem only treatment.